Cleture Atlas · Emission Factors

Finding a factor is easy.Defending the choice is hard.

Atlas narrows the emission factors that fit your activity and calculation context, then shows comparable options together with the reasoning behind them.

Less research. Clearer reasoning. Your team stays in control.

Review your scenario See how it works

Factor selection support

Activity context is being evaluated

ATLAS / TR

Grid electricity purchased for our Istanbul facility

Activity

Purchased electricity

Location

Türkiye

Calculation

Scope 2

Unit

MWh

Relevant options

3 results

Electricity consumption-point emission factor

ETKB

Türkiye · Distribution grid · 2023 · MWh compatible

Türkiye electricity generation intensity

EMBER

Global electricity dataset · Generation-based comparison · Annual

European Residual Mix

AIB

Europe · Market-based comparison · 2025

Finding a factor is not the real problem

The cost of a poor choice appears after the calculation.

A factor may look numerically correct while belonging to the wrong geography, period, unit, or methodology. That gap often becomes visible only during review and reporting.

Atlas does not produce a longer result list. It narrows the decision space and makes the reasoning visible.

Research takes too long

Teams search different datasets using different terms for the same activity, making current and applicable factors difficult to identify.

Choices become inconsistent

The same activity may be calculated with different assumptions across facilities or periods, weakening comparability.

Reasoning is rebuilt later

When source, year, geography, and unit decisions are not captured, the selection must be explained again during review.

A real selection moment

“Which factor should we use for 48,200 Sm³ of natural gas consumed at our Istanbul facility?”

Atlas evaluates the activity as it happened instead of asking the team to translate it into dataset terminology, then presents options in a context the team can review.

Decision summary

Ready for review

Activity

Stationary combustion · Natural gas

Geography

Türkiye prioritised

Methodology

GHG Protocol compatible

Unit

Sm³ directly usable

The recommendation is not only a value; it is a decision record that explains why the factor fits.

How does a recommendation become a decision?

Five steps, without losing control.

Atlas does not automate the selection into a black box. It accelerates research, compares options using the same criteria, and leaves final approval with the sustainability team.

The result: faster selection, more consistent calculations, and reasoning that does not need to be reconstructed later.

01
Describe the activity
State what happened in the operation without knowing the dataset's exact terminology.
02
Clarify the context
Location, period, methodology, and the available unit become part of the evaluation.
03
Compare the options
Review relevant factors side by side with source, scope, and usability information.
04
Let your team approve
Accept the recommendation, choose an alternative, or record the decision with an expert note.
05
Use it in calculation
Carry the selected factor into the calculation together with its source and context.

Inside the workflow

Three small details that matter

Work in your own language

Describe the activity in the local team's language while preserving a shared calculation context.

See unit compatibility early

Required conversions or missing physical parameters become visible before calculation begins.

Keep the selection trace

Source, year, geography, methodology, and version stay with the decision.

Atlas in your workday

The same factor problem looks different across teams.

Atlas is not a database showcase. It is designed to help sustainability teams complete recurring selection work faster and with clearer reasoning.

Sustainability team

Monthly activity data arrives under different names

Fuel, electricity, and waste records from facilities do not use a shared factor vocabulary.

The team describes the activity instead of searching dataset terminology and reaches relevant options faster.

Multi-country organisation

The same activity does not use the same factor everywhere

Local sources, reporting periods, and geographic applicability vary across companies and facilities.

Each facility is evaluated in its local context while group-wide selection criteria remain consistent.

PCF and CBAM team

A generic factor is no longer enough

The source and conditions of product-, material-, or supplier-specific factors must be tracked separately.

Public, licensed, and organisation-specific factors are distinguished within the same decision workflow.

Coverage and evidence

A broad library.A narrower decision space.

Coverage matters because it can separate meaningful options for the right geography, period, methodology, and unit—not because it can place more results on screen.

The numbers show coverage. Every factor's source and applicability support the decision.

293,938

canonical factor and result versions

Inventory snapshot dated 28 August 2026; source observations are excluded.

public source families

National bodies, methodologies, energy, LCA, and regulatory sources.

242,927

records with country applicability

Canonical versions that support narrowing geographic selections with local context.

Priority sources for Türkiye

12 / 20 priority

Twelve source families covering local data, international methodologies, EU regulation, logistics, and life-cycle contexts for corporate calculations in Türkiye.

All 20 source families

Expand the sources that complete global and sector-specific coverage.

+8 sources

Cleture Atlas

Turn factor selectioninto a defensible decision.

Let us review how Atlas narrows the options using your activity, country, unit, and reporting methodology.

Start with your first scenario.

Request a demo Review the workflow

Environmental Performance

Product & Supply Chain

Compliance & Reporting

Sustainability Management